No, i can´t blog about the weather every time i write someting here. That would be boring. Let`s talk about something more exciting, like encyclopedias.. Eh… Well…
In the corner of my old room, atleast it was there last time i looked, there is a big pile of books. Big books. Heavy books, where the top of the pages are covered in a golden colour. They take too much place to be in any of my bookshelves, that are overfilled as they are. But i have a hard time throwing them away, also. The books in the corner is an edition of the norwegian national encyclopedia. If i remember correctly i bought them while in military, maybe being a bit too over-confidence getting some money while i was there. Now i`m not sure how long it has been since i looked anything up in them, but it must have been some time. Even though i have bought several of the yearly updated books that they rung and offered me around newyear every year.
Maybe their golden age had gone allready by the time i bought them, btw. My best experiences with encyclopedias are more from libraries writing essays in junior high. Yes, this was the age before Internet. They where not for loan, but in a reading room. And since the door was closed i kind of always was unsure whether i really was allowed in there. But concquering my fear of someone throwing me out i opened the door, and sat down with all the encyclopedias and world histories that wasn´t supposed to leave the library. It was a bit special, and i read lexicon articles, wikipedia-entries i browse more or less. I might miss that, but nostalgica doesn`t change the fact that the age of the big books are past.Last years they have only been standing there, as in many other households i presume .Or in other households – even older editions, back to the first one from the beginning of the 20th century around the days of independence from Sweden.
Because once they were a sign of status in every bookshelves, a national golden standard of knowledge, even part of nation building. And not just in Norway, most countries had their version of the national encyclopedias. But now it´s over. Even though it might rise from death in some other form, the two publishing companies that has been responsible for the encyclopedia is now saying: enough is enough. The competition from free content on the Internet, read Wikipedia, was a competition that was just too strong. Last years they have only lost money on it. Now they hope that a foundation, perhabs with public funding, can take over.
That people don´t want to buy an expensive pile of books, even though they smell and look nice, which takes a lot of place seems reasonable. I love books, but within limits. Paper might be sexy, but not very environmentally friendly. And looking at their webpage for the first time it`s almost sad. Last entry at the moment, seems to be isogon. It`s a line that connects points with the same magnetic “misvisning” (means something like misleading). It´s verified by be a section at the university, quality marked. And then there is a gigantic commercial directly under it. Talk about cheapening your service. The whole page looks like some sort of daily rag. Which is ironic, since some of the people behind it has been very sceptical to the “folksy” image of wikipedia. Other entries might be better, but all in all Wikipedia wins most of the time, even witout quality-marked verification. (And yes, i am aware of problems with Wikipedia-articles as well).
One of the suggestion about what we should do with the encyclopedia is to open up, and merge it with the norwegian wikipedia. That would give a chance to combine the thorough process that the entries in the national encyclopedia has gone through with the possibility of constant re-editing tin wikipedia. If the scientists and others could follow their work and continue monitoring the entries it would continue to give a quality mark on it. We do need somewhere to go to where we can rely on the sources. Like i trusted the books looked away in the reading-room. A guide in the wilderness of information. That sounds like a good solution, best of both worlds, though im not sure it will end there. Too much historical stubbornness and traditionalism stands in the way for using the possibilities that Wikipedia offers. And some seems to be more content ending up on the historical dustbin, than continue to evolve it in modern medias. But the books are out in the open, and out of the reading rooms for good. Better get used to it.